Legal Opinion

State v. Mesa

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 1999No. 98-1529PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.

The central issue in this case is whether Lakewood police officers violated the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, as applicable to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment, and/or Section 14, Article I of the Ohio Constitution, when they conducted an inventory search of appellee’s lawfully impounded vehicle. For the reasons that follow, we find that the officers, in opening the unlocked armrest console of the automobile and finding the loaded handgun, did not violate the Fourth Amendment or Section 14, Article I. Accordingly, we reverse the judgment of the court of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Colorado v. BertineSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Florida v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. State v. HathmanOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State v. RobinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1979

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. State v. Banks-HarveyOhio Supreme Court · 2018
  2. United States v. MundyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
  3. State v. BargerOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. State v. MesaOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. GrubbOhio Court of Appeals · 2010

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API