State v. Grubb
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Rogers, Judge.
{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Rachel Grubb, appeals the judgment of the Defiance Municipal Court overruling her motion to suppress drug paraphernalia obtained during a search related to a traffic stop. On appeal, Grubb contends *746that the trial court erred in overruling her motion to suppress because the search was unconstitutional pursuant to Arizona v. Gant (2009), 556 U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 1710, 173 L.Ed.2d 485. Based upon the following, we reverse the judgment of the trial court.
{¶ 2} In February 2009, Grubb was charged via complaint with one count of possession of drug paraphernalia…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. BrowningOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
- State v. SlussOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- State v. DunbarOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- State v. MooreOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- State v. RoarOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.