Legal Opinion

Sheridan v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 31, 1997No. 2-96-272-CRPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Michael Eugene Sheridan appeals his convictions for the offenses of felony driving while intoxicated and failure to stop and render aid. Sheridan pleaded guilty to the DWI offense and not guilty to the charge of failure to stop and render aid. The jury found him guilty of both charges. It assessed his punishment for the DWI at three years’ confinement in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, and five years’ confinement, also in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, for the charge of failure to stop and render aid.…

3Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Polk v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  2. Garcia v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
  3. Hill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  4. Ex Parte MartinCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  5. State Ex Rel. Curry v. CarrCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by18 opinions

  1. Billy George Hughes v. Gary L. Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice,institutional DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
  2. St. Clair v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2000
  3. Arnwine v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2000
  4. Allen v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1998
  5. Garza v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1999

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API