Mullenmaster v. Newbern
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
In an action for conversion of a boat, a jury found in favor of appellee and assessed both compensatory and punitive damages against appellant. On appeal, appellant claims that the evidence was both insufficient to prove a conversion as of the date found by the jury and to award punitive damages. We affirm.
As to the conversion count, appellant’s main contention is that where the original taking was lawful, a demand for return must be made before a conversion can occur. Senfeld, v. Bank of Nova Scotia Trust Co., 450 So.2d 1157 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); Rupp v. Schon, 608 So.2d 934 (Fla. 4th DCA…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Senfeld v. Bank of Nova Scotia Trust Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
- Rupp v. SchonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- Jonat Properties, Inc. v. GatemanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
- Bank of Miami v. TambourineDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
3Cited by2 opinions
- Herman v. The Mr. Cooper Group Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2024
- Loris B. Ranger v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018