Legal Opinion

Bank of Miami v. Tambourine

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 21, 1969No. 68-506PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PEARSON, Judge.

The defendant-appellant, The Bank of Miami, suffered an adverse verdict in a trial for conversion of a boat. The jury awarded the appellee $1,000 compensatory damages and $2,000 punitive damages. It urges as error the court’s denial of its motion made at the conclusion of the plaintiff-appellee’s case and renewed at the close of all of the evidence for a directed verdict upon the claim for punitive damages.

The parties agree that the controlling law was set forth by the Supreme Court of Florida in Winn & Lovett Grocery Co. v. Archer, 126 Fla. 308, 171 So. 214 (1936):

“ * * * the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Winn & Lovett Grocery Co. v. ArcherSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
  2. Doral Country Club, Inc. v. Lindgren Plumbing Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
  3. General Finance Corp. of Jacksonville, Inc. v. SextonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
  4. Levine v. KnowlesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
  5. LINDGREN PLUMBING CO., INC. v. Doral Country Club, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ashland Oil, Inc. v. PickardDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
  2. Ciamar Marcy, Inc. v. Monteiro Da CostaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  3. Garrison v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  4. Mullenmaster v. NewbernDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  5. Tcheou v. Weimer, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API