Legal Opinion
Barone v. Waterfront Commission
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 9, 1959PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJoseph A. GavagaN, J.
Tbis is a motion by the president and secretary treasurer of the Harbor Carriers (Chenangoes), Local 1826, International Longshoremen’s Association (Ind.) to qnash and vacate identical subpoenas duces tecum served upon each of them by the Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor (hereinafter referred to as the “Commission”).
Chenangoes, whose title and function began when the Erie' Canal served as a new route for this city’s commerce, now generally perform the same work for railroads as longshoremen do for marine carriers. Unlike longshoremen, however, the chenangoes who work on the waterfront…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Matter of Edge Ho Holding Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Carlisle v. BennettNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
- Dunham v. OttingerNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Darweger v. StaatsNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
- Dairymen's League Cooperative Ass'n v. MurtaghAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Levine v. WhalenNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Martin v. State Liquor AuthorityNew York Supreme Court · 1964
- In Re Application of Waterfront Com'nSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- Bell v. Waterfront Commission of New York HarborDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1960
- Rego Properties Corp. v. Finance AdministratorNew York Supreme Court · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.