Legal Opinion
Snake River Farmers' Ass'n v. Department of Labor
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 9, 1993No. Nos. 91-35885, 92-35074 & 92-35075PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KLEINFELD, Circuit Judge:
The district court properly dismissed this case for lack of standing. The appellant-*794intervenors, farmworkers, lack an injury in fact likely to be redressed by a favorable decision. Two of them suffered no injury from the harm complained of, and the third seeks relief which would be of no benefit to himself. We therefore lack jurisdiction to consider the dispute on the merits.
I. Facts.
This ease was started by the farmers, not the farmworkers. The Snake River Farmers’ Association sued the Secretary of Labor to obtain changes in the terms upon which the Department of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- John W. Madsen v. Boise State UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Fernandez v. BrockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Carroll v. NakataniCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Columbia Basin Apartment Ass'n v. City of PascoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Monterey Mechanical Co. v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Hubbard v. 7-Eleven, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2006
- Nome Eskimo Community v. BabbittCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.