Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Bernstine

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 22, 1932No. Appeal, 188PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

All the members of this court, with the exception of Justice Maxey, who dissents (and Justice Linn, who did not sit in the argument), are of one mind that the judgment and order of the Superior Court in this case should be affirmed upon the record and for the reasons set forth in its opinion, reported in 103 Pa. Superior Ct. 518, and it is accordingly so ordered.

The judgment is affirmed and the record remitted that the sentence of the lower court be complied with.

Justice Maxey dissents on the ground that the evidence does not justify the conviction of the defendant on the charge of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Commonwealth v. BernstineSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. FolkesOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Commonwealth v. BermanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  3. Commonwealth v. NeffSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  4. Commonwealth ex rel. Sickler v. Yaukey, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Fulton County1956
  5. Commonwealth v. GettisPhiladelphia County Court of Quarter Sessions · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API