Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Bernstine

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 5, 1931No. Appeal 301PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Baldbige., J.,

The appellant, Louis J. Bernstine, a member of the bar, was indicted with Cyrus H. Raul and Neil Harkins, in bill 1783, March Sessions, 1930, charging conspiracy to extort, extortion and compounding a felony. He was indicted also with Raul in bill 1784, March Sessions, 1930', containing the same counts. The charges of compounding a felony were quashed on-motion of defendants and a demurrer to the evidence by Raul was sustained. Harkins was acquitted and a verdict of guilty of conspiracy to extort and extortion in the two bills was rendered against Bernstine. A new…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ParkerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  2. Fife, Jones & Stewart v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1857
  3. Commonwealth v. SaulsburySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  4. Commonwealth v. NathanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  5. Commonwealth v. BrandlerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BernstineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Trosper v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API