Commonwealth v. Bernstine
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Baldbige., J.,
The appellant, Louis J. Bernstine, a member of the bar, was indicted with Cyrus H. Raul and Neil Harkins, in bill 1783, March Sessions, 1930, charging conspiracy to extort, extortion and compounding a felony. He was indicted also with Raul in bill 1784, March Sessions, 1930', containing the same counts. The charges of compounding a felony were quashed on-motion of defendants and a demurrer to the evidence by Raul was sustained. Harkins was acquitted and a verdict of guilty of conspiracy to extort and extortion in the two bills was rendered against Bernstine. A new…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ParkerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Fife, Jones & Stewart v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1857
- Commonwealth v. SaulsburySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
- Commonwealth v. NathanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Commonwealth v. BrandlerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BernstineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Trosper v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1934