Legal Opinion
United States v. William H. Hockridge, Charles Petri and Stephen K. Easton
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided March 27, 1978No. 441, 443, 522, Dockets 77-1243, 77-1258, 77-1285PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OAKES, Circuit Judge:
The principal issue raised in this appeal is the propriety of the district court’s refusal to permit two jurors to impeach a partial verdict. Questions of sufficiency of the evidence with respect to appellant Hockridge, jury bias, adequacy of the conspiracy instructions, purported withholding of evidence by the Government, and erroneous evidentiary rulings are also presented, but each merits only limited discussion.
Appellants Hockridge, Petri and Easton challenge the judgments of conviction entered after an eight-week jury trial in the United States District Court for the…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- McDonald v. PlessSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- United States v. Carmine TramuntiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- United States v. BarnesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- United States v. David Thai, Lan Ngoc Tran, Minh Do, Jimmy Nguyen, Hoang Huy Ngo, Quang Van Nguyen, and Lv Hong, A/K/A "l.v. Hong"Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- United States v. John Bagnariol, United States of America v. Gordon L. Walgren, United States of America v. Patrick GallagherCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Frank MotenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- United States v. HilandCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.