Legal Opinion
Weiland v. Ruppel
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided April 30, 2003No. 27840PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHROEDER, Justice.
Kim Weiland (Weiland) asks this Court to reverse a custody decree in a filiation order which awarded her primary custody over her four-year-old son on the condition that she not leave Idaho. Erie Ruppel (Ruppel) is the child’s father. It is Weiland’s desire to move to Oregon with then.' son, contrary to the limitation imposed in the custody order.
I
BACKGROUND
Weiland and Ruppel were married in 1995. Ruppel lived in Idaho. Weiland was residing in Oregon with her four children from three previous relationships. She had one child with her first husband and a second child from a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Koester v. KoesterIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
- Ireland v. IrelandIdaho Supreme Court · 1993
- Kootenai Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Washington Water Power Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Beier v. Lewiston, City OfCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Beier v. City of LewistonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Bartosz v. JonesIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
- Danti v. DantiIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
- Wilson v. WilsonIdaho Supreme Court · 2024
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.