In Re Two Grand Jury Subpoenae Duces Tecum, One Dated January 28, 1985, the Other Undated
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GEORGE C. PRATT, Circuit Judge:
This is an expedited appeal from an order entered in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Charles L. Brieant, Judge, denying appellant’s motion to quash two grand jury subpoenas duces tecum. Appellant is the custodian of records of a corporation whose name, along with the briefs and record in this case, remains under seal to protect the secrecy of the grand jury proceedings. Fed.R.Crim.P. 6(e)(6). Appellant claims *54that the effect of the subpoenas is to compel testimony in violation of the fifth amendment “act of production”…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Hale v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Cobbledick v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Braswell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- In Re Motions of Dow Jones & Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- Bank of India v. Sapru (In Re Sapru)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1991
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoena (85-W-71-5)Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Issued June 18, 2009Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.