Legal Opinion
Sheffield-King Milling Co. v. Sorg
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Decided May 14, 1918PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Appeal from Franklin Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
*540Opinion of the Court by
William Rogers Clay, Commissioner
Reversing.
The Sheffield-King Milling Company brought this suit against F. J. Sorg, to recover damages for the breach of a contract for the purchase of flour. A trial before a jury resulted in a verdict and judgment for the defendant, and plaintiff appeals.
' The suit is based on a written order for 1260 packages of flour at the price of $5.00 per barrel, to be delivered in the months of October, December and January following. The contract is dated July 8, 1912, and purports to have been signed by Sorg. Sorg refused to receive the flour…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Louisville Ry. Co. v. HibbittCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
- Connecticut Fire Insurance v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
- Newton v. Bayless Fruit Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
3Cited by5 opinions
- H. H. King Flour Mills Co. v. Bay City Baking Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1927
- S. K. Jones Construction Co. v. HendleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
- Franklin Fire Insurance v. Cook's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
- Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States v. FanninCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
- Fowlkes v. Ohio Valley Tie CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925