Railway Labor Executives' Association v. Pittsburgh & Lake Erie Railroad Co., Interstate Commerce Commission, Intervenor
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
BECKER, Circuit Judge.
In 1926, Congress enacted the Railway Labor Act (“RLA”), in order to prevent railroad strikes from crippling interstate commerce. See ch. 347, 44 Stat. 577 (1926), now codified as amended at 45 U.S.C. §§ 151-188 (1982); Detroit & Toledo Shore Line R.R. v. United Transp. Union, 396 U.S. 142, 148, 90 S.Ct. 294, 298, 24 L.Ed.2d 325 (1969). The RLA prohibits a railroad employer from changing “rates of pay, rules, or working conditions” while a dispute concerning changes in a collective bargaining agreement is being negotiated. 45 U.S.C. § 156 (1982).
In…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co. v. BurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Watt v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Chicago & North Western Transportation Co. v. Kalo Brick & Tile Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Pittsburgh & Lake Erie Railroad v. Railway Labor Executives' Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Railway Labor Executives Ass'n v. Pittsburgh & Lake Erie RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Deford v. Soo Line Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
- General Committee of Adjustment, United Transportation Union, Western Maryland Railway Company v. Csx Railroad CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Burlington Northern Railroad Company v. United Transportation Union, Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers v. Winona Bridge Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.