In re Cotter
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBrearcliffe, Judge
¶ 20 I concur in the opinion as to the issue of equalization credit and in its denial of appellee's request for attorney fees. I respectfully dissent from the opinion as to spousal maintenance and would affirm the lower court decree as a whole.
Sufficient Property
¶ 21 The majority primarily concludes that the trial court failed to make a finding under A.R.S. § 25-319(A)(1) that Cotter had sufficient property to provide for her reasonable needs "during ... her lifetime." The majority concludes that "[p]ursuant to 25-319(A), the court may grant an award 'if it finds that the spouse seeking…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Neal v. NealArizona Supreme Court · 1977
- Marriage of Deatherage v. DeatherageCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
- State v. HindenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
- State v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- Town of Wickenburg v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.