Legal Opinion
Warbasse & Lee v. Card
Supreme Court of Iowa
Decided March 12, 1888PublishedCited by 9 opinions
Appeal from Qerro Gordo District Qourt. — Hon. John B. Cleland, Judge. • Action to recover for a furnace sold. Judgment below was for defendant, and plaintiffs appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtSeeveks, C. J.
The petition states that plaintiffs and ■defendant entered into the following written contract:
“ Mason City, Iowa, August 31, 1882. We agree to furnish, and we agree to pay for, a No. 61 Ruby brick set furnace and covering burrs, delivered at the post-■office building of this city, $194.75. The same to be paid for February 1, 1883. Messrs. Warbasse and Lee to furnish man to superintend the setting of the same and .guaranty said heater to work successfully, and operate as well as any other first-class furnace under similar circumstances. Mr. Card to furnish brick-work and materials for setting…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Mast & Co. v. Pearce & CowanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1882
- McMillan v. B. & M. R. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1877
3Cited by9 opinions
- Conant v. National State BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Blackmore v. Fairbanks, Morse & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1890
- Tracy's Administratrix v. Carver Coal Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1905
- Hammond v. WolfSupreme Court of Iowa · 1889
- Electric Storage Battery Co. v. Waterloo, Cedar Falls & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1908
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.