Legal Opinion

Bernards Township v. Stebbins

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided November 26, 1883PublishedCited by 41 opinions

APPEALS FROM THE -CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. The facts are fully stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gray

These are appeals by a township in New Jersey from decrees of the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of New Jersey, upon bills in equity by the .appellees for relief against the accidental omission of seals on its bonds. The facts, appearing by the record,, are as follows:

By the general laws of New Jersey, the inhabitants of each township in the State are a body politic and corporate, by the name of “The Inhabitants of the township of'-in the eounty of-.” Rev. Stat. of N. J. of 1877, 1191.

On the 9th of April, 1868, the legislature of New Jersey passed a statute entitled “ An…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Montclair v. RamsdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. Sheldon v. SillSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
  4. Barney v. Baltimore CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1868
  5. Williams v. NottawaSupreme Court of the United States · 1881

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Zahn v. International Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Anderson v. WattSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Waite v. Santa CruzSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  4. Defiance Water Co. v. DefianceSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  5. Bullard v. City of CiscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1933

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API