Legal Opinion

Roland Shepard v. Michael Lane, Director, Illinois Department of Corrections, and Neil Hartigan, Illinois Attorney General

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided May 6, 1987No. 85-2885PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RIPPLE, Circuit Judge.

In this appeal, we are asked to review the district court’s denial of the appellant’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus, originally brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The petitioner has alleged three grounds for habeas corpus relief: 1) ineffective assistance of trial counsel in violation of his sixth amendment right to counsel; 2) denial of his fourteenth amendment due process right to a fair trial because of the prosecutor’s misconduct; and 3) denial of due process through the cumulative effect of the ineffective assistance of counsel and prosecutorial…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Darden v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Donnelly v. DeChristoforoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Sumner v. MataSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Hernando Williams v. James Chrans and Neil F. HartiganCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  2. United States v. Rejon TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
  3. United States v. Louis PirovolosCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
  4. United States v. Norris W. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  5. Jose C. Santos v. Darrell A. Kolb, Superintendent, Fox Lake Correctional InstitutionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API