Legal Opinion
Means v. Government of the District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 20, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2011-0382PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Re Document No.: 21, 26, 27
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Sustaining Plaintiffs’ Objections to the Magistrate’s Report and Recommendation and Adopting the Remaining Findings of the Magistrate’s Report and Recommendation
RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs, Katrina Means et al., were the prevailing parties in an administrative due process hearing brought pursuant to the Individuals with Disabilities in Education Act (“IDEA”). Plaintiffs then moved for reasonable attorney’s fees as a result of that litigation. The issue was referred to Magistrate Judge Kay, whose July 17,…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Paul W. Douglass v. United Services Automobile AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- Ennis Nettles v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Division of Corrections, State of FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- Park Motor Mart, Inc. v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Electronic Privacy Information Center v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Rochon v. LynchDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- McNeil v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Jones v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Suarez v. Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.