Legal Opinion

Hawaiian Ocean View Estates v. Yates

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 1977No. 5724PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

RICHARDSON, CJ.

Plaintiffs-appellees, Hawaiian Ocean View Estates (hereinafter referred to as Hawaiian) and Exeter Equities, brought an action to quiet title to property that had been sold at a tax sale to defendants-appellants, H. Paul Yates and Sally Yates. Hawaiian had been unsuccessful in attempting to redeem the property within the redemption period prescribed by HRS § 246-60 (1968). After the redemption period but before this action was brought, Hawaiian deeded the property to Exeter Equities with the condition and understanding that the former would remain…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Van Antwerp v. Van AntwerpSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  2. Anglo California National Bank of San Francisco v. LelandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  3. State v. LeongHawaii Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Lloyd v. GutgsellNebraska Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Chang v. Meaghers.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1953

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. MasonHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. In Re Application of Shipman, Ltd.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Serion v. ThorntonHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Opinion No. (1985), Oklahoma Attorney General Reports1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API