Sinclair v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Ruffin, Judge.
A jury found Lee Sweeney Sinclair guilty of entering an automobile with intent to commit a theft, obstruction, carrying a concealed weapon, and driving with a suspended license. In two enumerations of error, Sinclair challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting his conviction for entering an automobile. As the evidence was sufficient to support the verdict on this count, we affirm.
On appeal from a criminal conviction, the defendant no longer enjoys the presumption of innocence, and we view the evidence in a light most favorable to the jury’s verdict. So viewed, the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Agony v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Oakes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
- Murray v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
3Cited by9 opinions
- Drake v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
- Ruffin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
- Collins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.