Williams v. State

RUFFIN, Chief Judge.

Ajury found Changamere Williams guilty of burglary. On appeal, Williams challenges the sufficiency of the evidence. He also contends that the trial court erred in admitting similar transaction evidence and that he received ineffective assistance of counsel. For reasons that follow, we find these allegations of error lack merit and thus affirm.

1. On appeal from a criminal conviction, Williams no longer enjoys a presumption of innocence, and we view the evidence in a light most favorable to the jury’s verdict. 1 We neither weigh the evidence nor determine witness…