Legal Opinion

Maryland Attorney General Opinion 105OAG003

Maryland Attorney General Reports

Decided January 10, 2020No. 105OAG003Published

1Opinion of the Court

ABORTION STATUTORY INTERPRETATION – WHETHER SECTION 20-208 OF THE HEALTH-GENERAL ARTICLE PROHIBITS NURSE PRACTITIONERS, CERTIFIED NURSE MIDWIVES, AND PHYSICIAN ASSISTANTS FROM PROVIDING MEDICATION ABORTIONS – WHETHER THE SAME STATUTE PROHIBITS PHYSICIAN ASSISTANTS FROM PERFORMING SURGICAL ABORTIONS January 10, 2020 The Honorable Ariana Kelly House of Delegates of Maryland You have requested our opinion on two questions about the requirement in State law that “[a]n abortion must be performed by a licensed physician.” Md. Code Ann., Health-Gen. (“HG”) § 20- 208. First, you ask whether that…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Mazurek v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Kaczorowski v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  5. Whole Woman's Health v. HellerstedtSupreme Court of the United States · 2016

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API