Collier v. State
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtHines, J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.)
The case not depending on circumstantial evidence alone, a new trial will not be granted because of the failure of the court to charge the rule applicable to the sufficiency of circumstantial evidence to authorize a conviction. Where the case is one wholly of circumstantial evidence, this principle must be given in charge without request. Hamilton v. State, 96 Ga. 301 (22 S. E. 528); Weaver v. State, 135 Ga. 317 (2) (69 S. E. 488); The rule is otherwise when the case is a compound of direct and circumstantial evidence, and does not rest upon circumstantial…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Weaver v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
- Stephen v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1852
- Cantrell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
- Hamilton v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
- Nobles v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Strickland v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
- Hall v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
- Porter v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
- Jeffords v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
- Crumady v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1929
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.