Legal Opinion

Crumady v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 13, 1929No. 7045PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHines, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.)

It is urged by counsel for defendant that a new trial should be granted, because the court should have given, without request, in substance this instruction to the jury: “Recent unexplained possession of the fruits of a crime is a circumstance to be considered by the jury in passing upon the guilt or innocence of defendant, and it may authorize a conviction, if with the other circumstances of the case the jury are convinced of the defendant’s guilt beyond a *461reasonable doubt; but if such possession is reasonably and satisfactorily explained, and it is…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Vaughn v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
  2. Gore v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
  3. Weaver v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  4. Cantrell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  5. Hamilton v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sheffield v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  2. Blocker v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  3. Jacobs v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  4. Toney v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1943
  5. Boyd v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API