Crumady v. State
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtHines, J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.)
It is urged by counsel for defendant that a new trial should be granted, because the court should have given, without request, in substance this instruction to the jury: “Recent unexplained possession of the fruits of a crime is a circumstance to be considered by the jury in passing upon the guilt or innocence of defendant, and it may authorize a conviction, if with the other circumstances of the case the jury are convinced of the defendant’s guilt beyond a *461reasonable doubt; but if such possession is reasonably and satisfactorily explained, and it is…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Vaughn v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
- Gore v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
- Weaver v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
- Cantrell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
- Hamilton v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Sheffield v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Blocker v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
- Jacobs v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- Toney v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1943
- Boyd v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.