Legal Opinion

State v. Provost

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 2, 1992No. C6-90-2479Published

1Opinion of the Court

490 N.W.2d 93 (1992)

STATE of Minnesota, Respondent,

v.

Robert PROVOST, Jr., Appellant.

No. C6-90-2479.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

October 2, 1992.

John M. Stuart, State Public Defender, Michael F. Cromett, Asst. State Public Defender, St. Paul, for appellant.

Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., Paul R. Kempainen, Asst. Atty. Gen., St. Paul, James T. Reuter, Chisago County Atty., Center City, for respondent.

Heard, considered, and decided by the court en banc.

OPINION

SIMONETT, Justice.

Defendant-appellant Provost was convicted of first degree murder following a bifurcated trial where he pleaded not…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Rock v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Michigan v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. New York v. QuarlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API