Legal Opinion
DeCarlo v. Perales
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided May 2, 1997No. 89-CV-383PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM — DECISION AND ORDER
HURD, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
The plaintiffs have moved for an order pursuant to Rule 54(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Equal Access to Justice Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1988, for attorney’s fees, costs, and expenses against the defendants the Commissioner of Social Services of the State of New York Cesar A Perales (“Commissioner Perales”) and the Commissioner of Social Services of Oneida County Richard DuRose (“Commissioner DuRose”). The defendants have opposed all or part of the plaintiffs’ application.
The action was commenced…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Texas State Teachers Ass'n v. Garland Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Doreen Pino v. Raymond Locascio, New York Hospital, Cornell Medical Center, Westchester DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Wilder v. BernsteinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Blissett v. CaseyDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1997
- Hightower v. Nassau County Sheriff's DepartmentDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2004
- Baim v. NottoDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2003
- Patterson v. JulianDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.