Murphy v. Cain
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
1Opinion of the Court
AKIN, Justice.
James M. Murphy appeals a judgment in favor of M.A. Cain and Shirley Wilcox d/b/a Texas Reporters Association, awarding damages for breach of contract and attorney’s fees. In his sole point of error, Murphy contends that the judgment against him is statutorily barred by former article 320c.1 We disagree with this contention; consequently, we affirm.
Murphy is an attorney who, in the course of representing a client in a civil case in federal district court, contacted Cain to arrange for Cain or her employee to act as reporter for depositions in Ecuador. In the trial of this case,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cowling v. ColliganTexas Supreme Court · 1958
- Zelios v. City of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Nagle v. DuncanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Joseph Girthini Muigai v. United States Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Portnow v. BergCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Instone Travel Tech Marine & Offshore v. International Shipping Partners, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
- Cahn v. FisherCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
- Lowrance v. HortonTexas Supreme Court · 1998
- Murphy v. Cain, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1986