Legal Opinion

Lowrance v. Horton

Texas Supreme Court

Decided January 16, 1998No. 97-0710Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Daniel S. Lowranee appealed the property division part of the trial court’s judgment dissolving his marriage to Leslie Ann Horton. The court of appeals affirmed the trial court’s judgment. In its judgment, the court of appeals ordered Daniel S. Lowranee and Richard N. Countiss, jointly and severally, to pay all costs incurred in the appeal. Richard N. Countiss is not a party to the proceeding, but is Lowrance’s appellate counsel. In his Petition for Review, Lowrance’s first issue is that the court of appeals improperly assessed costs against his counsel. We agree.

The Civil Practice and…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Murphy v. Cain, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API