Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Dailey v. Barnhart

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided November 29, 1988No. 69011PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION

HANSEN, Judge:

Appellant, Dr. Edward Dailey, filed this action seeking to foreclose on a physician’s lien claimed under 42 O.S. 1985 Supp. § 46. He attached a copy of the lien wherein he claimed $1710.00 for medical services against Appellee Farmers’ Insurance Company.

Dailey provided chiropractic services to Appellee Markeeta Barnhart for injuries sustained in an automobile accident. The lien reflects the statutory language stating that Dailey provided the services “as a result of the act or negligence of another” (Pat Barnhart). The notice of the lien shows Dailey sent a…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Charles G. Erff v. Markhon Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  2. W. C. Case v. Dan C. AbramsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
  3. Bernard v. U. S. AircoachDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1953
  4. Nowata County Gas Co. v. Henry Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1920
  5. Wat Henry Pontiac, Inc. v. PitcockSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Joffe v. VaughnCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1993
  2. Brannon v. MunnCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2002
  3. TINKER FEDERAL CREDIT UNION v. LITICKERCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2022
  4. TINKER FEDERAL CREDIT UNION v. LITICKERCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2022
  5. TINKER FEDERAL CREDIT UNION v. LITICKERCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API