Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Felton

Dauphin County Court of Quarter Sessions

Decided March 1, 1922No. 31Published

Motion for new trial. Q. S. Dauphin Co., March Sess., 1921, No. 31.

1Opinion of the Court

Hargest, P. J.,

The defendant was convicted upon th* charge of drawing a check with intent to defraud when he had not sufficient funds in the depository upon which the check was drawn.

He has gone on a proverbial fishing expedition to set this conviction aside, but has steered a very uneven course. At the trial, a verbal motion was made to quash the indictment, because, having been drawn under the Act of April 18,1919, P. L. 70, it did not allege that the maker or drawer had failed to pay the said check after the defendant had been given ten days’ notice to make the check good. That verbal…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GilliganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
  2. Booth & Flinn, Ltd. v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  3. Commonwealth v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
  4. Kelley v. Mayberry TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  5. Commonwealth v. BeattySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1900

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API