Legal Opinion

Rouse v. Glascam Builders, Inc.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 1984No. 49698-6PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[As amended by order of the Supreme Court May 11, 1984.]

Dore, J.

The issues we address in this action are (1) whether an individual condominium owner may bring an action for damages for negligence and breach of warranty in construction of a common area patio without joinder of other condominium owners as party plaintiffs, and (2) whether the refusal to make repairs to a common area patio constitutes a violation of the Consumer Protection Act.

I

On December 30, 1976, plaintiff/respondent, Mrs. Winifred M. Rouse, purchased a condominium in the Windcrest Villa Townhouse Condominium Development from…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Anhold v. DanielsWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Haner v. Quincy Farm Chemicals, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Friendly Village Community Ass'n v. Silva & Hill Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1973
  4. Simonson v. FendellWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Guy Stickney, Inc. v. UnderwoodWashington Supreme Court · 1966

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Mendez v. Palm Harbor Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  2. Hanson Industries, Inc. v. Spokane CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  3. State v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987
  4. Wilbur v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
  5. Washington Federal v. GentryCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API