Legal Opinion

Urban v. Kerscher

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided May 23, 2018No. Appellate Case No. 2016-001213; Opinion No. 5560Published

1Opinion of the Court

GEATHERS, J.:

*132**619This is a child custody dispute between Nataschja Urban and family friends, Leo Kerscher and Mary Crew, over Urban's minor daughter (Child). Urban appeals the ruling of the family court granting custody of Child to Kerscher and Crew. Urban argues the factors outlined in Moore v. Moore , 300 S.C. 75, 386 S.E.2d 456 (1989) govern and militate the return of Child to her custody. Alternatively, Urban argues she has met the higher burden of demonstrating a substantial change in circumstances warranting the return of Child to her custody.1 We reverse and remand.

**620FACTS/PROCEDURA…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Lewis v. LewisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  4. Moore v. MooreSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
  5. Stoney v. SRSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2017

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API