Legal Opinion

Hogan v. People Ex Rel. Hinkley

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 14, 1949No. 16,012PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Jackson

Plaintiffs in error, to no avail, protested an increased levy by the Inheritance Tax Commissioner. They were unsuccessful in subsequent hearings in the county and district courts and come here seeking review.

Both plaintiffs in error are beneficiaries under the will of Thurza Wintermeyer, deceased. Both were adults when adopted by Thurza Wintermeyer as her daughters. Mrs. Wintermeyer predeceased them, leaving a will, duly admitted to probate, which provided specific legacies of $1,000 for Irene G. Slocum, and $15,000 for May C. Hogan. The latter also was named as sole residuary legatee and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fé Railway Co. v. EllisSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Magoun v. Illinois Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. Carter v. State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1939
  4. People Ex Rel. Rogers v. Estate of WatermanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1941
  5. Kirschner v. McCrackenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Dunbar v. SchaeferSupreme Court of Colorado · 1954
  2. People ex rel. Dunbar v. HoganSupreme Court of Colorado · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API