Legal Opinion
Mildred Soto, Cross-Appellant v. Adams Elevator Equipment Company, Cross-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided August 22, 1991No. 90-1333, 90-1335PublishedCited by 57 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RIPPLE, Circuit Judge.
A jury found that Adams Elevator Equipment Company (Adams) had violated the Equal Pay Act by paying Mildred Soto less than a similarly situated male employee and by retaliating against her after she brought suit regarding the wage discrimination. In this appeal, Adams seeks reversal of the district court judgment denying its motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict on the wage discrimination claim and awarding statutory liquidated damages on that claim. Ms. Soto’s cross- appeal seeks reversal of the district court judgment that she could not recover legal damages…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. AikensSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Missouri v. Jenkins Ex Rel. AgyeiSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Trudy WALTON, Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. UNITED CONSUMERS CLUB, INCORPORATED, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Anne Dey v. Colt Construction & Development CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Stanley v. University of Southern CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Alfonso Avitia, and Diane Larsen v. Metropolitan Club of Chicago, Incorporated, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- Dorothy Kovacevich v. Kent State UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.