Legal Opinion

Foothills of Fernley, LLC v. City of Fernley

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 3, 2009No. 08-16010Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Foothills of Fernley, LLC (“Foothills”) appeals from the district court’s grant of *111summary judgment to the City of Fernley and individual municipal defendants (“City”). This suit arose after the City passed two municipal ordinances in quick succession (Bill 43 and 59), that changed the in-lieu of fee and dedication requirements respectively for City water. Foothills, a Nevada-based developer, claims that Bill 59 violated its equal protection and due process rights under both the United States and Nevada constitutions. Foothills also claims that the City impermissibly applied Bill…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Heller v. Doe Ex Rel. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Shanks v. DresselCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  3. Cool Fuel, Incorporated v. William H. Connett, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  4. Mendez v. County of San BernardinoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. Magana v. Commonwealth Of The Northern Mariana IslandsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API