Mills v. Agnew
District Court, D. Maryland
1Per curiam
Some two hundred owners of slot machines in Southern Maryland, who are also citizens, voters and taxpayers, have brought this action against the Governor of Maryland and other officials of the State and various officials of Counties in Southern Maryland, to declare that section 264B of Article 27 of the Annotated Code of Maryland violates the due process and equal protection clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, to enjoin the enforcement of that section, and for other relief. Jurisdiction is claimed under the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and 28…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Samuel Bailey v. Joe T. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Ex Parte PoreskySupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Stone v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Allen v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1973
- Abell v. Secretary of StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968