Legal Opinion

Baumann v. Post

New York Court of Common Pleas

Decided December 1, 1890PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from ninth district court. Action by Samuel Baumann against Edward S. Post. There was a judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

Read the full summary

Appeal from ninth district court. Action by Samuel Baumann against Edward S. Post. There was a judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals. Laws N. Y. 1885, c. 526, g 1, (4 Rev. St., 8th Ed., p. 2519,) provides that “a warehouseman, or person lawfully engaged exclusively in the business of storing goods, wares, and merchandise for hire, shall have a lien for his storage charges, for moneys advanced by him for cartage, labor, weighing, and coopering paid on goods deposited and stored with him, and such lien shall extend to and include all legal demands for storage, and said above-described…

1Opinion of the CourtBookstaver, J.

The action was brought to recover the possession of furniture claimed by the plaintiff under two certain chattel mortgages, on which-the defendant claimed a lien as a warehouseman. The judgment was based upon an agreed statement of facts, from which it appears that the plaintiff, a furniture dealer, on or about the 14th of December, 1888, sold and delivered to one Helen Funk all the furniture in question, except one barrel-head couch, for the sum of $329.59. Of this amount she paid $40 in cash, and agreed to pay the remainder in installments of $20 on the-7th of each month thereafter until…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Spraights v. . HawleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
  2. Hammond v. DanielsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879
  3. Bissell v. . PearceNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
  4. Storms v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
  5. Scott v. . DelahuntNew York Court of Appeals · 1875

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State Trust Co. v. Casino Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  2. Ludwig, Baumann & Co. v. RothNew York Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Matthews v. Victor Hotel Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API