Legal Opinion
Ludwig, Baumann & Co. v. Roth
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 15, 1910PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment of the City Court of the city of New York, dismissing the complaint.
1Opinion of the CourtSeabury, J.
This is an action to recover damages for the alleged conversion of household furniture. The answer is a general denial and pleads that the defendant had a lien for forty-four dollars upon the goods. The plaintiff sold to one Adler certain household furniture which Adler stored with the defendant who was engaged in the storage warehouse business. Adler paid the storage charges up to October 6, 1907. The plaintiff demanded the goods of the defendant on November 7, 1908. The plaintiff originally sold the goods to Adler subject to a chattel mortgage which gave it the right to possession upon any…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Leadbetter v. N. H. LeadbetterNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Hazlett v. Hamilton Storage & Warehouse Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1905
- Baumann v. PostNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1890
3Cited by4 opinions
- Smith's Transfer & Storage Co. v. Reliable Stores Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1932
- Bloomingdale Bros. v. Rosa Cook & George B. Holman Co.United States District Court · 1930
- In Re Siena Publishers AssociatesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Buckley-Newhall Co. v. BangsCity of New York Municipal Court · 1927