Legal Opinion
City of Fort Lauderdale v. Freeman
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided May 10, 1952No. 13927PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUTCHESON, Chief Judge.
Aggrieved at an order 1 of the district judge, which had affirmed the order of the referee deferring action on the city’s petition and continuing the trustee in possession, the City, appealing on a statement of points and .a limited record, is here insisting that the order appealed from was erroneously entered and must be reversed.
The trustee, pointing out that the orders of referee and judge were not final but interlocutory, indeed were not in a legal sense dispositive, insists: (1) that the referee’s order 2 was not reviewable 3 by the judge; and (2) that the judge’s…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In Re PrindibleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940
- Federal Land Bank of Springfield v. HansenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
- Goldie v. CarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
- Petersen v. Christ's Church of Golden RuleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
- Universal Oil Products Co. v. Cosden Petroleum CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1949
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Harrison v. Flota Mercante Grancolombiana, S. A.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- In the Matter of Lloyd James Durensky, Bankrupt. United States of America v. Lloyd James DurenskyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Peter MonsantoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- In Re DurenskyDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1974
- In the Matter of Ben Hyman & Co., Inc., Bankrupt. Ben Hyman & Co., Inc. v. The Fulton National BankCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.