Legal Opinion

Eaddy v. Jackson Beauty Supply Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 13, 1964No. 18213PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Brailsford, Justice.

In this action for damages for personal injuries, allegedly caused by the negligence of an agent of the corporate defendant in the operation of a motor vehicle in the scope and course of his employment, the jury found a verdict for the defendant and plaintiff has appealed.

The complaint contained appropriate allegations to charge the defendant with liability under the doctrine of respondeat superior. The first defense of the answer denied these allegations. Subsequent defenses admitted that the defendant’s truck was being driven by its employee on the occasion in question,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Norris v. ClinkscalesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1896
  2. Powers v. RawlsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1922
  3. Collins-Plass Thayer Co. v. HewlettSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1918
  4. Goodwin v. HarrisonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1957
  5. Van Dolson v. EarlesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1959

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Baker v. WeaverCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1983
  2. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  3. Fairchild v. South Carolina Department of TransportationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012
  4. MacK v. RileyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  5. Koutsogiannis v. BB & TSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API