Legal Opinion

Foster v. Beckman

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 10, 1935No. 4334PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Justice.

Appellee sued appellant for damages growing out of a collision of their respec- - tive trucks on a public highway. He alleged and proved severe bodily injuries, consisting mainly of the loss of an arm, and also damages to his truck.

Appellant’s answer and his evidence raised, among others, the defensive issue of contributory negligence. All main and corollary issues relating to negligence, submitted to the jury, were answered against appellant. The defensive issues will be referred to hereafter.

Upon the verdict returned, the court entered judgment for appellee in the sum of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Texas v. HarringtonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
  2. Philadelphia, Wilmington, & Baltimore Railroad v. Philadelphia & Havre De Grace Steam Towboat Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1860
  3. San Antonio & A. P. Ry. Co. v. BehneTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
  4. Sutton v. Town of WauwatosaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
  5. Waterman Lumber Co. v. BeattyTexas Supreme Court · 1920

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. International-Great Northern R. v. AckerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  2. Pettes v. JonesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Dillingham v. CurrieCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  4. Clary v. Morgan Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1952
  5. DoAll Dallas Co. v. Trinity National Bank of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API