Legal Opinion
Garaux v. Pulley
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 1, 1984No. Nos. 83-2076, 83-2236PublishedCited by 103 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:
The issue presented on this appeal is whether the district court was required to provide explicit notice to Garaux, a pro se plaintiff, of its intent to transform defendants’ motion to dismiss under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) into a motion for summary judgment under Fed.R.Civ.P. 56. We hold that it was.
Garaux was' originally an inmate of the California Men’s Colony (CMC) in San Luis Obispo, California. While at CMC he was placed in administrative segregation. A few days later, a hearing was held at CMC to review that placement-. Garaux was found guilty of threatening a…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Dayco Corporation v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, Dayco Corporation v. Firestone Tire & Rubber CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
- John R. Hansen v. Raymond W. MayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Ikerd v. LapworthCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1970
- Wayne Hudson v. Kenneth L. HardyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
- Portland Retail Druggists Association, Etc. v. Kaiser Foundation Health PlanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by103 opinions
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Hall v. BellmonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Lee A. Rand v. James Rowland Nadim Khoury, M.D., William Bunnell Roy Lee Johnson Leo R. EstesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Hall v. BellmonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Webster Salasker Lucas v. Department of Corrections California Men's Colony-WestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.