Legal Opinion

Harris v. Baltimore Sun Co.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 8, 1993No. 95, September Term, 1992PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RODOWSKY, Judge.

Procedurally, this appeal involves a newspaper’s action under the Public Information Act to obtain the records of certain expenses incurred by the Office of the Public Defender (OPD) in defending a highly publicized, capital murder prosecution. Substantively, this appeal involves the scope of counsel’s duty of confidentiality under Rule 1.6 of the Maryland Lawyers’ Rules of Professional Conduct (MR).

*598OPD is created by Md.Code (1957, 1990 Repl.VoL), Art. 27A. It is “the policy of the State of Maryland to provide for the realization of the constitutional guarantees of counsel in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Polk County v. DodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Moberly v. HerboldsheimerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  3. United States v. SuarezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  4. In Re Criminal Investigation No. 1/242qCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  5. Thanos v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. McGrawWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Post v. BregmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  3. Caffrey v. Department of Liquor ControlCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  4. Prince George's County v. Washington Post Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  5. Police Patrol Security Systems, Inc. v. Prince George's CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API