Legal Opinion

Wright v. AT&T

District Court, D. Montana

Decided April 1, 2025No. 2:24-cv-00197Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION IN RE: SNOWFLAKE, INC., DATA SECURITY BREACH LITIGATION MDL No. 3126 TRANSFER ORDER Before the Panel:* Pro se plaintiff in the action listed on Schedule A (Wright) moves under Panel Rule 7.1 to vacate the order conditionally transferring the action to MDL No. 3126. Defendant AT&T Inc. opposes the motion and supports transfer. After considering the argument of counsel, we find that the action involves common questions of fact with the actions transferred to MDL No. 3126, and that transfer under

28 U.S.C. § 1407

will serve the convenience…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re Kauffman Mutual Fund ActionsUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1972
  2. In re Watson Fentanyl Patch Products Liability LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2012
  3. In re Maxim Integrated Products, Inc.United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2012
  4. In re Tylenol (acetaminophen) Marketing, Sales Practices & Products Liability LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API