Legal Opinion

Gardner v. Richardson

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 26, 1974No. Civ. A. 71-103PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DITTER, District Judge.

Plaintiff seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare pursuant to Sec tion 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). This case had been previously remanded to the Secretary to consider crucial evidence. After a second hearing, the Secretary nevertheless reaffirmed his decision that plaintiff is not entitled to disability benefits. Before me are cross-motions for summary judgment.

The claimant, Eurene Gardner, is fifty-four years old. In January, 1959, she and her husband were found unconscious after…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Minnie Gold v. The Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
  4. Fannie Mae Jeralds v. Elliott L. Richardson, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
  5. Thomas E. Depaepe, Sr. v. Elliot L. Richardson, Secretary, Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Janet Wier, on Behalf of Her Son, John P. Wier, a Minor v. Margaret M. Heckler, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
  2. Rodriguez v. CalifanoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1977
  3. Capoferri v. HarrisDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Davis v. CalifanoDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Torres v. HarrisDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API