Rose v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
FRANK, Judge.
Rechell Lynn Rose, appellant, was convicted, in a bench trial, of use of a firearm while in the commission of robbery, in violation of Code § 18.2-53.1. On appeal, appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence, contending that the victim’s perception of the weapon as a firearm is necessary to sustain the conviction. For the reasons stated, we affirm the trial court.
BACKGROUND 1
“On appeal, Ve review the evidence in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth, granting to it all reasonable inferences fairly deducible therefrom.’ ” Archer v. Commonwealth, 26 Va.App. 1, 11,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Martin v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1987
- Archer v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1997
- Jay v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2008
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Towler v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2011
- Orlando Rondell Williams v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2012
- Dezfuli v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2011
- Dollar Tree Stores, Inc. and Arch Insurance Company v. Kathleen TefftCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2018
- Adrian Donnel Aley v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2022
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.