Legal Opinion

Rose v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided March 4, 2009No. 2762073PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRANK, Judge.

Rechell Lynn Rose, appellant, was convicted, in a bench trial, of use of a firearm while in the commission of robbery, in violation of Code § 18.2-53.1. On appeal, appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence, contending that the victim’s perception of the weapon as a firearm is necessary to sustain the conviction. For the reasons stated, we affirm the trial court.

BACKGROUND 1

“On appeal, Ve review the evidence in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth, granting to it all reasonable inferences fairly deducible therefrom.’ ” Archer v. Commonwealth, 26 Va.App. 1, 11,…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Martin v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1987
  4. Archer v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1997
  5. Jay v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2008

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Towler v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2011
  2. Orlando Rondell Williams v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2012
  3. Dezfuli v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2011
  4. Dollar Tree Stores, Inc. and Arch Insurance Company v. Kathleen TefftCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2018
  5. Adrian Donnel Aley v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2022

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API