Surety Insurance Company of California v. Lee Williams and Betty Williams
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER OF REMAND
Appellants Lee and Betty Williams appeal from the district court’s 1 order denying their motion to vacate an adverse judgment which the district court entered pursuant to a settlement agreement. The Williamses contend that the judgment should have been set aside under rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure because their attorney lacked authority to agree to the settlement. We vacate the district court’s order denying the rule 60(b) motion and remand this case to the district court for further proceedings.
We briefly review the underlying facts and proceedings in this…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Thomas v. Colorado Trust Deed Funds, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
- Clarke v. BurkleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
- Smith v. Widman Trucking & Excavating, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
- The Bradford Exchange v. The Trein's Exchange, Trein's Gift Collector Showcase, James Petrozzini, Gordon Brantley, and Mike ReimerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
- Associates Discount Corporation v. Sophie Goldman, Administratrix of the Estate of Maurice Goldman, Deceased, and Sophie Goldman, IndividuallyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
3Cited by59 opinions
- Cashner v. Freedom Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Keithley Edwards v. Born, Inc. Appeal of Keithley Edwards and Edith EdwardsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Laura Heim v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Clarence Heim v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Elmer Heim v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
- Koval v. SIMON TELELECT. INC.Indiana Supreme Court · 1998
- Jennings v. ReedNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.