Legal Opinion
Martin v. Hibernia Bank & Trust Co.
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided October 31, 1910No. 18,376PublishedCited by 9 opinions
Action by Mrs. Esther A. Martin against the Hibernia Bank & Trust Company. A judgment for plaintiff was affirmed by the Court of Appeal, and defendant applies for certiorari or writ of review.
1Opinion of the CourtLand, J.
The opinion and decree of the Court of Appeal in the above-entitled cause reads as follows, to wit:
“On January 27, 1906, Nott & Ward, residing at Cleveland, Miss., drew their check on the Bolivar County Bank, also situated at Cleveland, Miss., and sent it by mail to plaintiffs, who reside in the country a few miles from Areola, 111. Plaintiffs received the check on *304January 30th, and on the next day sent it, for collection and credit, to the Areola State Bank at Areola, 111. This bank received it on February 1st, and on the same day mailed^ it to the American Trust & Savings Bank at Chicago,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Exchange Nat. Bank of Pittsburgh v. Third Nat. Bank of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Continental National Bank v. First National BankMississippi Supreme Court · 1904
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re Hibernia Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
- Joffrion-Woods, Inc. v. St. James Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1930
- Sabine Canal Co. v. Crowley Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
- Northwestern Bottle Co. v. RosenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1927
- City National Bank v. Cooper & GriffinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1912
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.