Legal Opinion

Application of John J. Lainson

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 17, 1964No. Patent Appeal 7239PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Judge.

This appeal is from a decision of the-Board of Appeals of the United States-Patent Office affirming the examiner’s rejection of claims 1 through 8 of appellant’s application, serial No. 676,850, filed' August 7, 1957, for Plastic Pipe as un-patentable over the prior art. No claims are allowed.

The application discloses a pipe made-up of two concentric layers of a plastic-material, such as polyethylene. The pipé-is described as comprising an inner, hollow, cylindrical core of translucent, unadulterated polyethylene “moleeularly bonded” to an outer cylindrical layer of'…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Application of Philip A. Shaffer, JrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
  2. Application of Edward M. Rothermel and Russell B. Waddell, JrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1960
  3. Smokador Mfg. Co. v. Tubular Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
  4. In re EarleCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1939

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Diane M. DillonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
  2. Application of Richard F. ShannonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
  3. In Re Diane M. DillonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API